What is interesting is that compared to the older history, git has replaced svn, pip has replaced easy_install, and virtualenv has now completely subsumed buildout. Oh, how the mighty have fallen!
$ history | awk '{a[$2]++ } END{for(i in a){print a[i] " " i}}'|sort -rn |head -n 20
209 git
123 python
34 ls
31 mate
18 cd
14 pwd
9 hg
8 touch
7 rm
6 cp
5 pip
5 mv
5 django-admin.py
4 mkvirtualenv
3 mysql
3 mkdir
3 bash
2 deactivate
2 add2virtualenv
1 workon
4 comments:
Here is mine currently... :)
78 ls
73 git
72 cd
35 vagrant
25 deactivate
21 workon
20 sudo
17 e
15 mkvirtualenv
14 fab
13 django-admin.py
13 cat
11 runserver
11 ex
9 rm
9 pip
6 ./bin/craigslist_import.py
5 grep
5 cdvirtualenv
4 ssh
If you add this to your .profile/bash_rc you can make the results more interesting.
export HISTSIZE=50000
My bash history then goes back until at least the start of this year. Very handy if you want to search for something and I've not noticed a slowdown (even of running the history command).
So you got rid of buildout, he? :-) How do you deal with the recipes that you're now missing? Or didn't you use them? I use buildout to generate my apache config, just to name an example, and to set up my django project.
I assume you also used some of those recipes. How do you handle such tasks now?
@Reinout - The final buildout project I was on got converted to pip/virtualenv + either apt or homebrew depending on who was developing it. The consensus has been to use native tools to build environments and that designers and developers find buildout cumbersome, kind of undocumented, and hard to debug.
And I stand by that statement. I think buildout grew from a straightforward Python package management system and into something else that tried to be kind of like Chef or Puppet but purely focused on Python.
I need to blog my thoughts about it. :P
Post a Comment